WA House Proposes Saving Money by Eliminating Children of Illegal Immigrants

The Washington State Legislature is at a stand-off.

The State Senate, controlled by the Republican-lead Majority Coalition Caucus, believes the projected $1.9 billion in new revenue from existing taxes is sufficient to fund state operations.  However, the state House, controlled by the Democrats, has been seeking $1.5 billion in new taxes to fund the budget they favor.

In recent years, the Washington State Legislature has gone into extra sessions to pass a budget when there were multi-billion reductions in state revenue and when there were multi-billion increases.

Buried in the weeds of the current stalemate is a unique, yet offensive, House budget proposal that seeks to save money by reducing the number of babies born to illegal immigrants.

The proposal would make illegal immigrants eligible for a program called “Take Charge”, which funds contraceptives and abortion.  The program estimates that it will enroll 12,000 illegal immigrants who are not currently part of the program.

According to the House Budget, “Savings will be achieved by preventing unwanted pregnancies that generate state costs for prenatal, birth, and postpartum services and for medical coverage of newborns.  These women are eligible for state medical assistance upon pregnancy and their children are eligible for continued coverage.”

The proposal is troubling because the racial implications are unavoidable. “We hope there will be less of you.”

Family Planning Budget Item Edited (1)

The proposal also seems to contradict the spirit of the recently passed REAL Hope Act in which the Washington State legislature made government funding for higher education available to students who came to the country illegally.

Regardless of how we feel about public funding of education for non-citizens, we should be able to agree that, “Get an education, just don’t have any babies” is wrong.

This proposal is not part of the Senate budget and in light of the significant differences on the size of the budget, it is unknown how big of a sticking point this particular item is.

Still, as the country clamors for racial reconciliation in the wake of the tragic shooting in Charleston, the implication that leadership in the House of Representatives is hoping to reduce the number of babies with brown skin is beyond concerning.

Targeting the immigrant community with schemes for population control needs to be condemned in the strongest way.

Racial considerations aside, the strategy of saving money by reducing the number of people is certain to fail if implemented.  Yes, people have created lots of problems.  But people have always been the solution to our problems as well.

People are good.

Babies are really good.

Even if their parents aren’t rich, aren’t white, and weren’t born here.

The legislature has until the end of June to pass a budget before some government services will be shut down.  Call the Legislative Hotline at 1-800-562-6000 to share your thoughts with your legislators or you can email them by clicking here.

Always be respectful and courteous, but always be heard.

4 replies
  1. 11th Gen American
    11th Gen American says:

    Of course the State of Washington should do what it can to limit the number of children born to illegals! The state should also have the ability to limit the number of children born to residents and citizens who are collecting social-welfare benefits! When a nation like ours has both open borders and a generous welfare state, any nation, no matter how prosperous, will eventually economically collapse! The welfare rules in Washington State should be so strict, any welfare family, or any illegal immigrant family, or any refugee family, should be limited to two children! At the cost of over $10,000 per student to provide a public education, and with every birth on medicaid costing taxpayers up to $30,000, the taxpayers of this state cannot continue to afford to support an ever-expanding population of people who are dependent on the government for their basic financial survival!

    Reply
  2. Tionico
    Tionico says:

    funy how the state gummint is all eager to take god care of folks here as a result of their free decision to come here breaking our laws. Whenever you subidise (feed) something you always get more of it. And this is nowhere more true than in the area of illegal invasion.

    Our elected “representatives’ need to consider the fate of these peole and their children in terms of what resources or help they’d have available to them had they stayed home rather than invading Washington. IF they want to come here, let them rely upon the resources of the comunities to whcih they move… families, neighbourhood,s towns, churches, etc. Or what they might have were they to return to their own homes. WHY should we who have built what is here be FORCED at gunpoint to bear the burden of their chlices…… starting with the decision to come here?

    Stupid bleeding heart legislators, if THEY want to support these invaders, they can do do out of THEIR pockets. It is far too eacy fot THEM to decide how I wil be forced to “give”.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply to Tionico Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.