Why Christians and Secular Leftists Disagree So Much

Christians and secular leftists disagree about a lot of things. Religious faith, or the lack thereof, is a strong predictor of how someone will feel about issues like sexuality, gender, marriage, assisted suicide, and abortion.

Have you ever thought about why we disagree about so much?

In order to understand our disagreements, I think it’s helpful to first acknowledge where we agree. We all want people to be happy.  Really.  There might be individuals we don’t like and grudges we carry personally, but in general, we want other people to be happy and we want to be happy ourselves.

That’s a great start.

Our differences, however, lie in the fact that we have very different ideas about what will make people happy and we disagree about what makes people happy because we have different views about the nature of our existence.

Secularists believe the human existence is random and purposeless.  We were not created by anyone so we are not accountable to anyone; we appeared out of nothing and will return to nothing.  Because there is no creator, there is no moral law and as a result, the best we can hope for out of life is to simply be happy, which we achieve by doing the things we believe will make us happy.

Changing your gender will make you happy? Great.  Want an abortion to fulfill your life plan and find happiness? Outstanding.  Want to marry someone or many people of the same gender, multiple genders, or no gender at all? Who am I to judge?

Christians share the hope that individuals will find happiness, but believe happiness comes in a very different way.

Christians believe the key to joy, which is better than happiness, is not found by acting on our desires but by fulfilling the purpose for which we were created.   Christians also believe that each person has been infected by sin which causes us to desire things that will not only fail to bring happiness but actually lead to misery.  For Christians, happiness is not the goal but a byproduct of fulfilling our created purpose which often requires us to surrender our desires for our own good.

If there is no moral law, family structure and sexual behavior is merely a matter of preference.  If we have not been created with a specific purpose, changing your gender is no more significant than changing your shirt.  Do what makes you happy.

But if there is a creator and if our creator has created us so that our mind, soul, and body are all distinct yet connected and flourish only to the extent they fulfill the purpose for which they were created, then good intentions are not enough to find happiness.

A car may wish to run on water in order to save the planet but will find mobility frustrating because that was not how it was made.

But who is right about the nature of our existence?

If the secularist is right, you would expect those who indulge their desires and impulses most to be the most fulfilled.

If the Christians are correct, the key to happiness is found, in part, in our ability to deny ourselves and live for someone greater. As Jesus said, “whoever seeks to save his life will lose it, but whoever will lose his life for my sake will find it.”

If we want, we can continue arguing about who is smarter or who has better intentions. But it may be more helpful to recognize the things we actually agree on and then have a long conversation about what actually makes people happy.   After all, there’s where many of our political quarrels are coming from anyway.

 

3 replies
  1. Graham Yates
    Graham Yates says:

    There’s a few fundamentally wrong propositions here;
    ” We (secularists) were not created by anyone so we are not accountable to anyone”. Wrong. Secularists are accountable to exactly the same number of people as religious people – just not to a god. These might include family, friends, colleagues, the law or themselves.

    “Because there is no creator, there is no moral law”. Wrong. While there is no single, written moral code, there is centuries of philosophical thinking and writing on correct morals to consider. And to suggest that secularists might have no moral code that they live by is supremely arrogant.

    “… the best we (secularists) can hope for out of life is to simply be happy”. Wrong. The implication here is that secularists are entirely selfish and live their lives according only to their own uncontrolled desires without consideration for others. Clearly not the case.

    “If there is no moral law, family structure and sexual behavior is merely a matter of preference”. The implication here is that the Bible is the only moral law, which of course is wrong. The law serves as a moral code – and one that far more accurately reflects our society’s current thinking. If we only lived by the Bible’s moral code, then slavery would still be acceptable and animal cruelty or child molestation are not even worth mentioning.

    While certain aspects of religion are commendable, it certainly doesn’t hold the monopoly on moral behaviour.

    Reply
  2. steve gish
    steve gish says:

    Hello from Sequim. To get past subjective conclusions, I think using objective data, when available, can be eye opening. So, how does one obectively quantify “happiness?” Not easy, but we can do so for “unhappiness.” Note the statistics for “counselors per capita” through the years, starting mid last century. To summarize: when we kicked God out of our culture, unhappiness has grown. Culture tries to achieve secular happiness… it fails… No argument necessary.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.